Because:
- They don't have the manpower in-house
- They don't have the expertise in-house
- They have the manpower and the expertise, but they want a second opinion.
Antoine Henry de Frahan
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
FAVORITES
« Reporting Lines | Main | The Emotional Cost of RFP »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455dc6469e2012876b8af0b970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why General Counsel Call on Law Firms:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
ABOUT US
SUBSCRIBE
RECENT ARTICLES
- Associations d'avocats : le choix de la réussite
- Legal Departments and Law Firms: a Widening Gap?
- Dis Papa, c'est encore loin le partnership?
- Zeg Papa, is het nog ver naar het partnerschap?
- Lawyers in Business Meetings
- What Is Your Firm Worth?
- Compliance : quels contours pour une nouvelle fonction stratégique ?
- Avoiding the Side-Effects of Lockstep
- Predicting Cross Selling Performance
- Associations d'avocats : le choix de la réussite
- Managing Partners: This Is Your Moment!
- Law Firm Political Systems
- How to Get More Value for Money from Outside Counsel
- A Law Firm Is a Jazz Band
- The Backbone of a Law Firm
- European Law Firms Will Become What They Measure
- Towards 2018: Unlocking the Missing Link in Law Firm Management
- Leiderschap of lijderschap in associaties
- Independence is not a Strategy
- Homo Legalus et le Legal Risk Management
You missed one reason : They don't have the power to intervene ... (this is when they are confronted with a legal procedure) ... ;-)
Posted by: Yannick De Smet | January 31, 2010 at 02:54 PM
This news can be interesting for many people. I'll advise to read this post to my friends.
Posted by: sheet extrusion line | June 14, 2011 at 09:15 AM